Don't have an account yet? 
Forum Thread
♛ PokéHeroes Book of Records! ♛
Forum-Index → Discussion → ♛ PokéHeroes Book of Records! ♛
Posted: Mon, 29/01/2018 14:21 (6 Years ago)
Posted: Mon, 29/01/2018 17:03 (6 Years ago)
Posted: Mon, 29/01/2018 20:19 (6 Years ago)
Posted: Tue, 30/01/2018 22:22 (6 Years ago)
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 14:37 (6 Years ago)
[Because I see evolved pokémon as FoS and a different pre-evolution, that was hatched later, as FoS for that pokémon]
Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 14:39 (6 Years ago)
Rest in Peace, Tasca
April 2003 - January 4th 2016
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 14:46 (6 Years ago)
First person who changed its haircut is the one who really had the 1OS pokemon, if someone evolved later a really old furfrou into Santa's the ID will be lower but that doesn't mean it's the first on site
EDIT: that's why taking a picture of the pokedex with the one and only pokemon/shiny is so helpful for this thread most of the times
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 14:53 (6 Years ago)
The pre-evolution was hatched later than the evolution.
Bulbasaur/Ivysaur/Venusaur [normal] all have the same ID, because pokémon 33 [the first Venusaur] was also the first Bulbasaur and first Ivysaur.
I know that evolutions can have a higher ID [like 186] than its pre-evolution [like 56], but if your evolution has ID 68 [for example] it's simply not possible for the pre-evolution to have ID 294, because the evolved form was ealier, so its pre-evolution was as well [as it would've also been ID 68 before it was evolved.
Maybe I'm missing a criterium or something, because some lines do have the same number throughout, but I simply don't think that a non-evolved FoS could have a higher ID [as in 'later adopted'], than an evolved FoS.
disclaimer - All numbers [aside from Bulbasaur's] are fake, merely used to try and bring my point accross correctly. If my assumption is wrong and this is just a waste of time, I do apologise for that.
Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 14:56 (6 Years ago)
Rest in Peace, Tasca
April 2003 - January 4th 2016
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 15:06 (6 Years ago)
Except that I'm seeing [in the list] that the oldest Wimpod [with ID 143] is counted as FoS, instead of the oldest Golisopod [with ID 68]
A younger, pre-evolution, is counted as FoS rather than the older evolved form, which is why I asked my question in the first place.
Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 15:11 (6 Years ago)
Im sure that happens more often than not honestly with new pokemon being added.
Rest in Peace, Tasca
April 2003 - January 4th 2016
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 15:19 (6 Years ago)
Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 16:11 (6 Years ago)
I don't know how do you people feel about that, but honestly, it's unusual to two different pokemon from the same evolution family both have the first on site title just because the real first on site didn't evolve.
At this moment, there is no ideal solution that everyone would like.
If we would allow ID to matter, then all first stage evolutions can evolve and take over the title(s), which would be a mess, while without it, for many pokemon is impossible to determine their first on site.
(All this bothered me since long time ago, just saying, doesn't have to do anything with the recent discussion)
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 16:16 (6 Years ago)
FoS means FoS, regardless of ID, but it's simply impossible for a base pokémon to be FoS, if there's an evolution [NOT Forme Change] that's older.
[which is what the discussion was about]
Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 16:23 (6 Years ago)
I just wanted to share my thoughts about the whole FoS thing in global.
Posted: Sat, 03/02/2018 16:44 (6 Years ago)
Yeah, you are right, if there's an evolved form already, then that has to be the FoS. If there's a mistake I've made, then, please, make sure to show me what/where it is, and I'll make sure to fix it.
Thanks for the pointing this out!
Posted: Mon, 05/02/2018 00:48 (6 Years ago)
Edit: added the Prison Bottle since the discussion here about "First On Site" is so fascinating to me.
"Bingpot."
Posted: Mon, 05/02/2018 01:23 (6 Years ago)
I do believe VelvetNightmare hatched the first shiny Jangmo-o that they then fully evolve to a shiny Kommo-o
Posted: Mon, 12/02/2018 00:41 (6 Years ago)