Forum Thread
Gems
Forum-Index → Suggestions → Rejected → GemsLike if we hatch 10 or 20 normal type pokemon (slakoth, zigzagoon etc), we get one normal gem........
For rare gems like dragon or ice, the number can be increased to about 40-50.
I am not sure whether the eggs should be in sequence or not.....
If a user were to get one gem after every egg hatched, then what would be the importance of kalos eggs and rare gems like dragon and ice..
There already are original ways to get Gems.
Getting them with hatching, would make them too common. It would also cause an unbalance (I think...), because the rare gems would suddenly be as common as all the others, which would throw the values right out the window.
I like it fine the way it is.
Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!
How does it make a gem very common...
On an average, in shiny hunting, a person hatched 100 eggs, so he'll get only 5 gems...
And Angell, perhaps for that kalos thing, you'll have to hatch about 1000 pokemons of the same type, which is very difficult to do....
And for rare gems w can increase the value upto 50.
It's just going to be completely abused to get rare gems I think.
And if they get tired of Vanilite, they can hunt another Ice Type.
There would be less need for trades, which would lower the value, even if they only appear after a fixed number.
Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!