i dont think it qualifies as first as there's a Primarina which
would've been the first Brionne?
idk not sure how jackal is handling that as it is kind of an
awkward situation
Rest in Peace, Tasca
April 2003 - January 4th 2016
It's just my opinion but if there's a shiny Primarina on site
already then the shiny Brionne wouldn't be the first on site since
Primarina would have to have changed to a Shiny Brionne at some
point.
Meaning that Brionne wouldn't be first on site, just the only one
on site.
Just noticed a thing.
First shiny Manaphy on the list is 90641 but mine is 73303,
wouldn't make this the first onsite?
Loketoke's Manaphy (the one on the list) Mikleo's Manaphy
This shiny was formerly (bought in the AH 3 years ago) from Ecco,
but I always tought that Loketoke had the first one and this one
was the second.
But both the #id and the hatching time proves that this one is at
least half of a month older.
yes mikleo, it can be. Remember the amount of game center legends
that were hatched in a short time ;)
When this thread was opened and I talked to Espy about the Game
Center Shiny legends, I told her I had some doubts about suicune
(it was second catch but the first to hatch) and I knew I wasn't
the first in one of the legends (I thought it was entei, but later
we check and it was in fact the first). So the one I wasn't 1st
must be that manaphy you are saying.
Espy has/had the second Garchomp I believe, either way she should
know that mine is the 1st, so it's all good. Shiny Mega Pinsir is
definitely the first. Unless this is about non evolved shiny megas
too, though I highly doubt that.