Log In
Fighting Weather Castform Don't have an account yet? Register now!
.

Forum Thread

PokéRadar History

Forum-Index Suggestions Implemented PokéRadar History
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Sun, 09/11/2014 10:08 (10 Years ago)
I didn't say that the PokeRadar filter doesn't exist or so.

I am saying that this is better and more organized way,Plus it's easier and quicker. I've seen people saying their support on suggestion saying "Sure you can do that but this suggestion can make it more easy/Fast to access/ect." So why can't my suggestion be easy? So you want people to just keep mashing the button of show more when they seriously could just go and interact with those clicks they just did?

Like i said in the main post someone people have too many friend so they have too many feeds. So it will take a LOT of clicks to find the one they want to know.
The History can have something like 30 Days ago,6 Months ago,ect filter. So it will be really easy to access.
Doopliss
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 94

Forum Posts: 824
Posted: Sun, 09/11/2014 11:02 (10 Years ago)
Are you sure you're using the PokéRadar filter on the right side of the notification page to find the history of your hunts? I don't think the amount of friends/feeds by them shouldn't affect it at all. You don't have to dig through your main notification section to find the history of it. The PokéRadar filter gets rid of all that.

Besides, I actually think that filter is working more efficiently now. It's definitely taking less clicks than before for the little feeds to show up. All I think is it has a slight lag, that's all. I'm thinking all it needs to be fixed is that, or for them to show up after a click or two on the "Show More" button.

What CatLady is saying though is there is already a feature implemented that shows you previous chains, so another way isn't really needed. The filter just needs to be improved, in my opinion.

Character owned by me, art by JadeING
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Sun, 09/11/2014 11:28 (10 Years ago)
*Sigh*
It does affects it,I am saying that this is fast due to the fact that people want to see their older hunts...Just.. just... Ughhh i can't explain with words anymore.

I made a little video for you to watch,Hopefully this answers your question.

Count how many clicks i did on the video. Please.
And i am still on my seviper hunt right now.

And also i am lagging when i did that. Lagging a lot.
And the filter just digs your notifications and find a feeds that match the 'tags' it's coding stuff. Ask my brother,He knows.
So i dunno how you can upgrade it .-.
CatLady
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 103

Forum Posts: 8,577
Posted: Sun, 09/11/2014 12:01 (10 Years ago)
We already know that it lags. That's also why Doopliss and I have been saying that the filter needs to be improved/fixed, not made completely unnecessary (which is what I think will happen)...

And you don't have to 'click' so much... If you click once (and don't click anywhere else), you can press space bar to load the rest. (It will take the same amount of 'actions', but it won't be as taxing on the hand AND go a little faster, because the pointer won't be moving around).

Quote from CrowleyThis suggestion is to help people who have too many feeds at once,It's hard to find your PokeRadar feed when you have too many friend.

My earlier comment was because of this. A notification disappearing because of the many feeds and a notification disappearing because of its age are NOT the same thing. If you have too many feeds, clicking the filter will let you look at only the Pokéradar notifications, regardless of how many friend-feeds you have... If there's a new one, there'll be a (1) or maybe even a (2) next to it and you won't have to click 'show more'. You don't have to click 'show more' regardless, only when you want to see the history (which I think is any post older than 1 day)

Either way, it's clear we're both just rehashing the arguments already made, so let's agree we're disagreeing and leave it at that. I'm not saying users shouldn't support, I'm just saying why I don't support.
Credits for avatar to ~Cookie~

Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Sun, 09/11/2014 12:06 (10 Years ago)
*Deep long sigh trying to not sound immature*
No one said that,So how should i know? How should i or anyone else knows how? Plus the video shows the 'notifications' is you know,Mashed up. And the history i suggested is organized.

Fine,let's disagree. Just please don't post again..
You give me heeby-Jibbies when i see a forum notifications.
Please don't post 'okay' or anything like that to,it still give me the creeps.
CatLady
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 103

Forum Posts: 8,577
Posted: Sun, 09/11/2014 12:16 (10 Years ago)
Just gonna drop this here, because it has been said -

Quote from CatLady: 8th post, 1st pageI think your print screen is more like proof that it's a buggy button, because the site does store your Shiny Hunts


Quote from Doopliss: 2nd post, 2nd pageThe filter just needs to be improved, in my opinion.

Credits for avatar to ~Cookie~

Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Sun, 09/11/2014 12:27 (10 Years ago)
Just gonna answer your.. Thing

Answer for 1st
I still don't understand this Buggy button thing. But i am going to list what the button does for me -
1 - I need to click it many times or broke my spacebar
2 - I need to broke my phone to click the Show More button to find it.
And my phone is the worse.
3 - I need to face the lag on my computer that have a bad graphic card when i click the button
4 - I need to facedesk myself because of rage quit

Answer for 2nd
Some feeds have this little things on them,They have something you can call 'tags'.
You see,These tags is to arrange the feeds for filter. So unless Riako is a coding wizard or i didn't know anything,The filter cannot be improved. Because the site will search your whole data for notifcations and it will cause them to 'push' some of the feeds to the side,But they still there. Just ignored.
CatLady
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 103

Forum Posts: 8,577
Posted: Sun, 09/11/2014 13:51 (10 Years ago)
Bug (computer) - noun (-s): a problem in the code that causes a program (or part of a program) to not work properly. It can cause inconveniences to the user, or even some serious problems. A code with a (serious) bug is said to be buggy. (The button doesn't work properly = buggy button) [You never once mentioned not knowing what it meant, or I would've posted the explanation sooner]

So... You don't know how to improve the filter, so nobody can? Maybe it's possible, maybe it isn't. I don't know anything about codes, so I'm not gonna take either of them for truth. (until Riako says so)

It doesn't change the fact that it was mentioned in this thread (which was the only reason I posted), meaning you could have known, before saying you couldn't have known.
Quote from CrowleyNo one said that,So how should i know?

Credits for avatar to ~Cookie~

Kitties! Riako has no idea what he unleashed with that update🙀
Collecting Lovely Larvesta and Silly Seel Plushies~
Looking for Ice Gems and Flying Gems here! Help me hunt a Shiny Articuno!
(You can win your own non-shiny Articuno in return)
Breeding events for the cause here!
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Tue, 02/12/2014 03:33 (9 Years ago)
I still dont get it. And when i think about this in this 2 weeks. I realize it can be changed .. But i seriously dont know. I already said how the filter works. It just pushes ll the other feeds and then it tries to find the tagged feed on that page. Or i am mistaken.
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Tue, 23/12/2014 07:03 (9 Years ago)
Bump
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Sun, 28/12/2014 09:32 (9 Years ago)
Bump
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Wed, 07/01/2015 03:38 (9 Years ago)
Bump
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Sat, 17/01/2015 02:50 (9 Years ago)
Bump
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Tue, 20/01/2015 06:21 (9 Years ago)
Bump
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Tue, 03/02/2015 11:52 (9 Years ago)
Bump
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Sat, 07/02/2015 05:20 (9 Years ago)
Bump
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Tue, 10/02/2015 08:44 (9 Years ago)
Bump
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Mon, 16/02/2015 12:36 (9 Years ago)
Bump
If there's any flaws in my suggestion, please point it out, I would fix it
weskyspuppy
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 52

Forum Posts: 1,251
Posted: Mon, 02/03/2015 09:45 (9 Years ago)
Bump
CarpetMonster
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 34

Forum Posts: 1,134
Posted: Mon, 02/03/2015 12:54 (9 Years ago)
The PokéRadar filter, as it currently is, is not a viable solution.
You still have to click "show more" the same number of times and load the same number of feeds, and oftentimes, if you try to click it quickly to get to a far-off Radar notification, you'll end up loading the same set of feeds several times. If most of the time spent loading feeds is in vain (searching the same feeds you already loaded), then whether the filter is in place or not, it still takes forever (and it lags no less than searching without a filter - it saves you the trouble of SEEING the other feeds, but not of having to load them all).
However, that isn't what Doopliss and CatLady wanted to say; they wanted to update the filter so that it WOULD become a viable solution.

Which, in fact, actually contains (most of) the first suggestion. They're almost exactly the same anyway, so why not just combine them? ^^
There is a PokéRadar history, which is what this original suggestion wanted, and it is in the form of simply showing all of the relevant notifications and accessed through the Notification filters, which is the second suggestion. Filters, instead of hiding the other notifications but still including them with "show more" and making it annoying to search anyway (which is the only reason it was being denied as an alternative - not because they can't be made better, but because they aren't a viable solution currently), can all simply show 20 notifications of the same type. That accomplishes the requested PokéRadar history and also keeps the filters useful (and actually makes them more so).
The suggestions aren't mutually exclusive, other than the fact that the original suggestion said it should be accessed from the Radar page, which wasn't even the main point. (If it matters that much, you can just have a link to the filter from both Notifications and the Radar Page.) And if they aren't mutually exclusive, then why use one as an argument against the other? It'd be far better to just find a solution that includes both, especially if nothing has to be sacrificed from either to make it work. ^^

I admit that was rather disorganized, so here is a briefer version of this post:
• When a filter is applied, instead of loading but hiding the other notifications, just skip to the next relevant notification so you aren't wading through several blank pages that the filter uses to try to make it easier to find without helping you reach it in the first place.
• There is a link to the PokéRadar filter from the Radar page.
• Everyone's happy! ^^

Now, from what I understand, this is already almost the same as what CatLady and Doopliss were saying. The reason I made such a large post is not to show some new and wonderful idea, but to show that both "sides" seemed to think that only one suggestion could be added, when, in fact, they weren't mutually exclusive at all. ^^