Don't have an account yet? 
Forum Thread
union room clicklist ideas
Forum-Index → Suggestions → Implemented → union room clicklist ideas
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 07:29 (9 Years ago)
I'd like to recommend a new clicklist option, to interact with all those on your friendlist,but only their main parties, so you wouldn't have to go through your friendlist and open each of their pages separately and click their parties, and like the other it would change as new pokes and eggs are swapped in and out
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 07:35 (9 Years ago)
not everyone would just click everyone on their frendlist's party some people usually do it all.
for as like i am i plainly do the whole thing not just for money but to help others more until that question is answered no support :/
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 07:40 (9 Years ago)
@ShubhamSinha thanks for the support
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 08:00 (9 Years ago)
and the sheer size of the clicklist if it was to be a friendlist mass click it would be huge most players have 200+ to 500+ pokes and some people like me have over 100 friends so that's a huge clicklist that most people wouldn't be able to get through in a full day, i know i wouldn't
i hope that answers your problem
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 08:10 (9 Years ago)
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 14:49 (9 Years ago)
Why would you limit yourself a clicklist just for people on your friend list? For me I only have 12 people on my friend list, and if their parties all have 6 Pokemon, then that's 72 clicks. And then I'm done.
Why limit it? Everyone benefits from the clicklist, from having eggs hatched, to getting on the index page, to leveling up Pokemon, etc. This clicklist doesn't make sense to me because it sounds like you're limiting yourself in terms of clicking. You might as well mass click others or use the online clicklist or just return the clicks given to you or do it randomly. Your friends aren't only relying on you to click their eggs for example, they're most likely using the clicklists already in place to get those interactions, or making feeds for click exchanges. And if people don't want their Pokemon clicked it is usually for evolution reasons, which is why people give their Pokemon everstones to prevent that, so that shouldn't be an issue of people not wanting their Pokemon clicked.
This clicklist doesn't to me add any benefits that the other clicklists don't. So I don't support.
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 15:11 (9 Years ago)
As an example I have got many friends which I all want to click (and only their party's) so every day you would need to click all the people on your friendlist page so you can click them seperatly but when you got an clicklist you would be ready in less then a few minutes. so actually it would make a huge difference if you would click all the pokes seperatly from every party or click all the people from your friendlist in once.
Also this doesn't sound to me as a huge update like the pidgey express or such so this wouldn't be so hard for Riako and other staff members to make.
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 15:14 (9 Years ago)
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 15:33 (9 Years ago)
And reasons as to why skipping people would be inefficient can be found here (and I understand this suggestion isn't identical to that one, but I feel like they both have the same principle of "I only want to click certain users/Pokemon") and the reasons there as to why that suggestion wouldn't be helpful I feel can apply to his suggestion. Seems rude to exclude other users just because they aren't on your friend list or because you don't like them.
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 16:16 (9 Years ago)
Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 22:37 (9 Years ago)
Your friends aren't always going to be online at the same time as you, so maybe you'd want to click your friends first, online or not, then once you're done go to clicking all who are online.
Nobody really has to be excluded here. And the people who click only their friends benefit less. Although it may at least encourage those who almost never click, to at least click their friends. It honestly seems like a lovely idea to me. :3
Posted: Sun, 15/03/2015 21:14 (9 Years ago)