Log In
Normal Weather Castform Don't have an account yet? Register now!

Forum Search

I'm Feeling Lucky

Searching for: Posts from Buumee.
Posted: Mon, 03/09/2018 00:10 (4 Years ago)
Look, a crossover episode!

Username: Buumee
Base Pokemon: Tyranitar
2nd Pokemon: Sceptile
Extra: Replace the head with Squirtle's head.

[Read more]
Posted: Thu, 23/08/2018 19:14 (4 Years ago)
1) Berry Garden has improper scaling in difficulty of tasks in comparison to Bulletin Board tasks, especially after hitting higher levels.
2) Puzzle Pieces become drastically harder to get at higher levels and favors those that just started Berry Garden and start Bulletin Board early where you only need like 1~5 items instead of an unreasonable amount starting late.
3) Bulk Seeds/Cooking will at least will be a Quality of Life upgrade while keeping the same difficulty.

[Read more]
Posted: Thu, 23/08/2018 18:49 (4 Years ago)
1) An aesthetic with good intention, but unnecessarily impacts performance.
2) Removal/Toggle would greatly optimize the feature for those affected.

[Read more]
Posted: Tue, 21/08/2018 22:30 (4 Years ago)
Quote And saying something like, "I hate getting shiny gyarados! I'm going to keep putting them in the cycle until I get something good!"

I saw a post like this happen ago not too long ago... lol Honestly I'd want it to be stricter to a point where you don't get the receive the same species more then twice in a Wonder Trade session. This would prevent what I would call a "trade deficit" where you have to get new shiny pokes because you Wondertraded 5 different pokemon and got 5 shiny gyarados in return. Also make shared evo lines same species, so people can't fill with Magikarp, Gyarados, Weedle, Kakuna, and Beedril for example.

Would that limit the amount of possible potential trades? Perhaps, but not finding a "trade partner" still happens regardless at times (and has happened to me before anyway). This would prevent less salt in the wounds on a regular occurrence.

[Read more]
Posted: Wed, 15/08/2018 16:36 (4 Years ago)
Quote from RedRidingWolf1365If it was a situation where you asked for something and saw something with it that you didn't want, you could say "sorry, I've made a mistake. could you please delete?"

Anything you post online whether intentional or unintentional is subjected to stay online indiscriminately. One of the many downsides of reality of the internet. I don't really see any instance as to why you would need to delete it rather than simply saying "wrongchat/mistake my bad" unless it's something that you shouldn't be talking about on PH to begin with, and you are not guaranteed that the other user would agree to delete it (no matter how entitled you may feel to delete it).

Quote from RedRidingWolf1365Plus, if you had a conversation with someone and you didn't have them on your friendlist, it would get rid of clutter. Especially if you have s lot of actual friends.

See point #3. Also the ability to remove a conversation from appearing in your Palpad gets rid of personal clutter, faster, and is not disruptive to the whole process as initiating a vote to delete. Some of us also had lengthy conversations with not only friends but non-friend users. Trying to delete 1 conversation from your Palpad sidebar that could easily be from 5~100+ would be entirely cumbersome to both users to meet your own personal want rather than just hiding it from the list entirely until next time you talk with that user.

[Read more]
Posted: Wed, 15/08/2018 16:13 (4 Years ago)
I normally support suggestions that don't affect me so long as it benefits the bigger picture and is reasonable, however..

Reasons for No Support/Not Affected;
1) There really isn't a 'Why we need this' or at the very least 'Why you want this' clearly explained, as well as a why would it benefit us users.

2) Would it be nice to delete PP's? Sure, but I foresee underlying issues with this despite myself wanting this;
2.a) PalPad and Private Messages on Pokeheroes are tied "sessions" (for the lack of a better word atm) shared between 2 users which is presumably tied to an ID#. Basically an instant messenger with no "user side cache" (no personal instance), the ability to delete would compromise situations such as scamming/harassment/ect as it deletes it for both members.
The reason I base this assumption is due to a mod deleting their replies in a Private Message with me and it affected me as well no longer seeing them despite having the actual PM instance still exists for me. It would save a lot of space for them if this is true. Now if they aren't single session tied and are actually 2 separate instances, or change it to be so that a user can delete their side without affecting the other user - this will invalidate point #2 completely and I'd be more inclined to support.
Quote from RedRidingWolf1365There could be a thing where, if somebody tries to delete it, the other person gets a notification and can stop them, so it stays up. Only both people can decide when to delete it.

This defeats having the freedom to delete messages and turns it into more of a hassle for both users. Especially situations where they either don't want to/feel like it/inactive, it's not going to get deleted. If I ever felt something was worth deleting, I would want to delete it on the spot rather than wait for a consensus on whether or not it's going to be deleted.

3) I don't believe the current status of Palpad is negatively affected by the inability to delete, but it's current setup as a whole. Features that I personally believe would fix the cluttered appearance would be a better organization capability and quality of life changes such as; clear user from recent conversation, ability to pin favorite users/most talked to on the top, section off friends from non-friends, toggle show online users only, toggle show as invisible, and so on... You know kind of like an actual Instant Messenger.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 13/08/2018 15:14 (4 Years ago)
I like it. (Y)

Also, I also would like to see it implemented for all the ranks.

[Read more]
Posted: Thu, 09/08/2018 15:26 (4 Years ago)
Honestly, this really doesn't affect me at all because I don't use VS... but I'm going to support because of the continuity of Emera Pokemon typing rather than for the sake of VS Seeker.

Reasons for Support;
1) Previously stated, the continuity of Emera Pokemon typing. Logically that makes sense to me that it would affect the typing.

Dark Ponyta/Cursed Rapidash: Change to Fire/Dark rather than Mono Fire. Reason: Witch Vulpix/Magic Ninetails have dual typings with Fire/Ghost while being drastically and aesthetically different.
Lepreowth: Has a 4 leaf clover growing off it's tail and is a leprechaun. Is this thing Grass, Fairy, or Mutated? It's Normal.
Nightmare Munna/Musharna: Look at this Pokemon and tell me that it isn't Dark/Psychic. Dark typing also known as "Evil" typing in Japanese. That right there is the stuff of nightmares.
Sandwebble/Sandcrustle: Sand = Ground. Sandshrew/Sandslash. More importantly.. Sandygast/Pallosand made up of literal sand. Still Bug/Rock though.

[Read more]
Posted: Thu, 09/08/2018 14:47 (4 Years ago)
Reasons for support;
1) VS Seeker doesn't seek battles as you aren't given the choice to randomly battle users that are also seeking to battle. Eliminates the whole time sink of the current needlessly tedious process and would be more friendly especially to new users.
2) Reduces the possibility of users being bugged about battling.
3) VS Seeker seems like it has always been taboo to try to fix. Everyone knows that it's currently poor/outdated and a majority want it to be fixed, but these suggestions are still met with posts such as; "Don't play it if you don't like it", "Pokeheroes isn't dedicated for battling", or "Fight Area". I don't believe these are an appropriate alternative for dismissal as it is a band-aid to the underlying problem. Why have VS Seeker then? We might as well not have it if it will perpetually be broken and unchanged.

1) Have a Battle Lobby that features users being able to join, chat, and battle. Possibly even watch other people battle. It would be easier for players to organize with multiple users through Newsfeed.
2) Also allow players to have the choice leave their team on Auto Random Battle, giving users actively looking for battles a wider pool to battle from. Have Battle Points earned calculated by the Auto Team's Win Rate, Average Level, and if you already battled them that day to prevent abuse.

[Read more]
Posted: Thu, 09/08/2018 14:04 (4 Years ago)
Reasons for Support;
1) Allows tangible evidence of Shiny Rate % increase like how Shiny Charm does with Pokeradar
2) Players want to know what the actual chance is and how it is calculated including myself. Updated feature will affirm more users to buy into the PD sink Emera Fountain.

[Read more]
Posted: Thu, 09/08/2018 13:55 (4 Years ago)
Reasons for Support;
1) Reduces clutter from stale/old GTS posts.
2) Prevents users from wasting their time from inactive user posts.

Foreseeable Problems;
1) If GTS decay is too low, reposting trades will end up becoming a chore and adversely affect Quality of Life.

Suggestion: Clear GTS posts older than 90 days and Clear all the User's GTS Posts if inactive for 31 consecutive days.
This allows players to take a break while waiting for offers and doesn't negatively affect active users, while offsetting old trades and inactive users.

[Read more]
Posted: Thu, 09/08/2018 11:42 (4 Years ago)
Reasons for Not Affected;
1) I do not believe 35 retros is an "influx" or impactful enough to warrant it's own filter as there are many filters that would deserve to be made if solely based on the quantitative amount.
2) This suggestion is in the right direction as I do believe there should be an advanced filter system that has more freedom for both Auction House and GTS. One that allows you to search for criteria such as;

- Missing Pokemon
- Missing Shinies
- Missing Mega
- Region Search
- Allow Vouchers to be Searchable and/or Trade-able without Holding

Auction House
- Allow held items to be seen (not only Promoted Auctions) and/or Held Item drop down search
- Missing Shinies
- Missing Mega
- Region Search

Note: This serves primarily as an example as how many filters we could easily come up with whether we proliferate or consolidated filters. Any changes to these systems would be quality of life.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 06/08/2018 17:12 (4 Years ago)
@Hopelin Perfect. Thank you.

[Read more]
Posted: Wed, 01/08/2018 15:37 (4 Years ago)
Reasons for Support (Kinda);
1) Cannot see your example of the cropping issue image, but I did test to confirm. I've seen many users complain about this issue before and is a legitimate problem despite probably not being considered a top priority "fix".
2) I do believe Pokemon Sprites should be displayed consistently in size throughout the website for the sake of professionalism/continuity.
3) At the end of the day, it doesn't affect me functionally even though it can be visually unpleasing at times.

Suggestion: Have the elements conform to the default size of 96x96 for the sprites if they aren't already. That'd be less work than trying to find a way to resize images that do have problems in my opinion, although HTML is not one of my skills so correct me if I'm wrong.

Quote from MagikarpKingall sprites are 64x64 from what i know

Sprites are defaulted to 96x96 from the Pokemon's Page and Pokedex, with some exceptions such as Front Page/User Profile Party (both which crops to 80x80).

[Read more]
Posted: Tue, 31/07/2018 18:25 (4 Years ago)
Look, a crossover episode!

Username: Buumee
Base Pokemon: Clawitzer
2nd Pokemon: Flygon
Extra: Replace the head with Squirtle's head. Preferably 96x96.

[Read more]
Posted: Tue, 31/07/2018 17:04 (4 Years ago)
Pokemon Sprite style - 96x96.
1) Basically it's dealers choice of fusing 2-3 pokemon so you can have fun/be creative with it.
2) Lastly, the head must be Squirtle's and don't use any other parts of the Squirtle Evo-line.

Example can be found on my profile.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 30/07/2018 20:55 (4 Years ago)
Reasons for no support;
1) Having this system would increase interactions, that much is true, but at what cost? The purpose of nuggets being obtainable through donating is to well... support the website. Obtaining nuggets in another additional way diminishes the meaning. Especially through clicking...
1.a) Creates a negative dynamic between; a further divide between players that click 1m+/month vs those that don't or unable to, an influx of nuggets that will devalue them, and further promoting questionable practices.
2) GSC is perfect the way it is. The only thing I would change would be 'Legend Mode' but it costs a lot for a reason, however, 'Plus Mode' seems to be the most profitable/useful on paper.
2.a) Depreciated value of Trio Vouchers/Rare Candies/Gold Boxes/Gems, and increased Pokeballs/GCC Items.
QuoteIn my opinion it would cut the count days from 3-8 days to maybe a few days sooner for each love meter to give us 2x-3x days.

3) It makes much more sense to suggest decreasing the Love Meter requirements than to create a kill web of dependencies that would increase the frequency of 2x days.
4) The biggest driving factor in not being sold in this suggestion is because I was bamboozled by the Title, does not bring anything unique/new, and more or less simplifies an existing feature.
The What being suggested is unclear as you want multiple different things and does not portray "Spicy Interactions".
The How to implement is basically increasing rewards for doing the same thing.
The Why iterates the What.

[Read more]
Posted: Sat, 28/07/2018 21:10 (4 Years ago)
Quotethose 4 times that they were rejected, was because it was /literally/ just "hey another game does it we should do it like them"

I remember seeing a quote by Riako awhile back that this wasn't a valid reason to reject a suggestion.

Anyway, I support the idea due to bringing a system from the actual games and having it implemented in a way that suits this site. Did well on explaining ways to mitigate the "OP'ness" of such an RNG based system.

Possible dynamics that will change from this;
1) Strong Pokemon Medal Rally - Whoever has a PKRS to spread to their pokemon will get an advantage (not necessarily a bad thing)
2) Prof. Oak Battles
3) Ranklist - If you ever cared about being on that board, good luck.

[Read more]
Posted: Sun, 22/07/2018 21:26 (4 Years ago)
Reasons for No Support;
1) Everything that I read from OP's post is already negligible due to existing features (such as Filters).
2) A feature such as this that is restrictive in nature carries more negative impacts that will affect both sellers and buyers in a limiting way. This is even more restrictive than the auction house.
3) Post was highly over exaggerated and speculative in nature. Does not contain a well thought out solution/suggestion or reasoning, but rather a complaint.

GTS in it's current state is far from perfect, but also far from broken - it works. The beauty of GTS is being able to post what you're selling and what you're looking for without restrictions. Mind you that I'm an avid buyer in GTS and have used GTS to complete my Pokedex. I've never been affected in a negative way because someone was "posting too much stuff" in the drastic way it's been fabricated.

If there's something that I want in GTS, I use the filters and not sit at first page hoping what I want isn't being flooded with things I don't want. In fact multiple listings help consumers due to a wide variety of options. Can't afford 10x Black Keys? Luckily they posted 10 1x Black Key listings instead. "But they can just be PP'd/PM'd to make a personal trade." Good remark that was never made! Here's the problem; 1) To remake a trade already used up their 1/10 trades a day, 2) If I learned anything for my almost 1 year on Pokeheroes, there's a lot of antisocial people here that could care less about replying let alone for their trades and are even willing to put "Do not PM me about this trade".

Having a limited amount of trades would also affect the quantity/quality of listings. Why post random unwanted pokemon or items of less value when I can list another post with higher value/worth? Would you still be upset if there were more bulk trades where a single that could take a half the page itself with "junk" you don't want or listings that you couldn't afford? What if you wanted a pokemon you were missing, but you were told that by someone that it was a waste of a trade for them? There's such a freedom with GTS that anyone can use it to complete their Pokedex as well as getting any item they want, albeit with time and effort. With this feature I don't see it.

[Read more]
Posted: Thu, 19/07/2018 22:25 (4 Years ago)

[Read more]

<-- Previous site || Next site -->