Don't have an account yet? 
Forum Search
I'm Feeling Lucky
Searching for: Posts from Ephenia.|
Ephenia OFFLINE   Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Fri, 28/08/2020 23:43 (4 Years ago) |
|
[Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Fri, 28/08/2020 22:24 (4 Years ago) |
|
[Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Fri, 28/08/2020 22:15 (4 Years ago) |
     
[Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Thu, 27/08/2020 03:09 (4 Years ago) |
|
Also, with this other suggestion being implemented recently and already in full effect, then it makes sense that this suggestion should be passing through along with it. They're pretty much a pair, being two suggestions that are different yet relatable ideas that ultimately aim to accomplish the same goal in mind. That's in regards as to why I mainly suggested them to begin with, anyway. [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Tue, 25/08/2020 19:33 (4 Years ago) |
|
It's intentional (placeholder), that's because Slugua's icon isn't made/on site yet. A similar clause can be found on pages such as Mega Crobat's if you see its Mega Capable information (still doesn't have its mega icon on site yet). [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Fri, 21/08/2020 17:19 (4 Years ago) |
|
I was confused myself and thought it was 10 instead of 5 too because I was reading the Wiki page before the event had started. Thank you for reporting it and pointing this out! [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Thu, 20/08/2020 23:59 (4 Years ago) |
|
[Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Wed, 19/08/2020 01:26 (4 Years ago) |
|
This should help out a lot with those of you who need help with Hangman a lot easier, or want to help improve another community based project that's centered around our Hangman game. The helper is also very easy to use, and user-friendly. It also allows you to add your own list of words in case I may not be around to update it to include newly discovered words that have been found. [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Tue, 18/08/2020 19:57 (4 Years ago) |
|
The clicklist itself isn't broken and works fine under normal circumstances. What you're showing can be rather normal when interacting using the Newest Adoptions clicklist. If you can't interact using it while you can with other clicklists, then it's something on your end. It would likely be something connection related, or possibly something in relation to your browser's environment affecting it and how it works. [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Mon, 17/08/2020 11:02 (4 Years ago) |
|
https://pokeheroes.com/forum_thread?id=76510 [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Sat, 15/08/2020 21:59 (4 Years ago) |
|
Besides the point. They may as well be unbanned following that logic. No point of being banned if you can still play and have goals on this site. It will affect that one banned user who still is that shouldn't be able to enjoy the game. It will also affect us all knowing that bans on this site are true bans that cease and prohibit all game/site activity from users who are banned. Just the way bans should be. Mmmmm not precisely... I'm very positive from my own observations, it's the user of the Pokémon switching under different IPs to interact with their Pokémon as a guest simply because more clicks = more EXP. I doubt it's being used as advertising of any sort. [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Fri, 14/08/2020 09:10 (4 Years ago) |
|
Basically, this suggestion is for ultimately to prevent a banned users party Pokémon from showing up in the Online Clicklist if they happen to come online. That would be by not letting their Last Action update even if they happen to come online. There's a particular banned user (not going to say the name) who comes online just about every day, and their Pokemon are always in the Online Clicklist. The reason why they are doing this is simply due to them wanting to level up their Pokémon and for them to of course get more clicks on them from everyone else easily, no other reason really. Why they do it is because they can still compete in the Strongest Pokémon ranklist, but my other suggestion already covers dealing with that part of the problem. Realistically speaking? This shouldn't even need to be a suggestion, but clearly a particular banned user is still somehow playing and enjoying the game for months on end now. Does that not defeat the purpose of being banned? If this suggestion gets implemented, then it will definitely highly discourage the behavior that this banned user in particular has been proving to show for months now. On top of that, it will also help all these banned users actually move on. Especially if they have received something such as a permanent ban and are highly unlikely to ever be unbanned. Anyway, can't think of any con with this being a thing. Banned users don't deserve a place any longer on this site/deserve any sort of platform (in this case PokéHeroes) in any sort of capacity. They violated the site rules and didn't abide by them and deserve the punishment they have received. The only thing a banned user should be able to do is given at least a chance to appeal their ban, nothing else. [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Sun, 09/08/2020 19:12 (4 Years ago) |
|
Since you want to bring up PFQ, you do realize it being very interaction oriented with its gameplay is what garners it having lots of activity? PFQ has a total of approximately 21.4 billion on site interactions amongst all of its users. PH on the other hand? It only has a measly total of approximately 6 billion interactions. PFQ is only 3 or so years older than PH. By the time PH passes as old as PFQ is right now at this rate, it still won't surpass the amount of total site interactions PFQ has had in the same amount of allotted time. I doubt it will even be close whatsoever. On top of that, PFQs overall site activity is 250% greater than that of PH's overall site activity. There's a ton more people online daily with PFQ compared to PH. PH has almost around 34,000 less users currently than PFQ does, but even if you compare the amount of users to each site's activity, the amount of users doesn't really matter so much. PFQ only has 120% more users than PH does, so yeah those numbers are pretty much irrelevant to site activity. Also, sure, you're entitled to have you own opinion with saying PFQ is already enough for YOU, but not everyone plays PFQ nor cares about it. You really can't speak for everyone and only yourself on that. Anyway, based off of the overwhelming support that this suggestion has so far, I think it's pretty clear and safe to say that a change is needed. It's very apparent that people don't feel rewarded enough for actively playing the game through interacting. That's pretty much the main point that this suggestion is driving across, and it's a very valid point. Even myself as a player who has actively played this game for the past 3 years. I can wholeheartedly say that I fully agree with the point of this suggestion and what this fellow community member has said. The problem with PH in regards to its gameplay is that it lacks being as interaction based simply because actively interacting doesn't reward players enough. If interacting was more rewarding in a way that would appeal to a larger audience, then more people would actually interact which would in turn also directly inpact this site's activity. If you want to know why PFQ is more successful with garnering activity with its users, then that's a big reason as to why it actually is. Helping overome the pure RNG of the daycare system with active play is a brilliant idea. [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Wed, 05/08/2020 02:48 (4 Years ago) |
|
Yeah, I think that would be a good idea too. Personally, I would need 2 flags too, and I think many others would like to see 2 flags. [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Mon, 03/08/2020 08:06 (4 Years ago) |
|
If banned users have a Pokémon that are in the Strongest Pokémon ranklist, then those Pokémon should be removed while the user is banned. Banned users are already removed from every other ranklist, and they should have no presence on any ranklist category if they are banned. This ranklist should be no exception. There's 2 current users that have Pokemon on the Strongest Pokémon ranklist that are banned. If they were removed, then that would allow for a 9th and 10th Strongest Pokemon to enter the ranklist that weren't there before. Basically, not only would this create equality amongst all the ranklist in regards to banned users being removed. But it also makes the ranklist more fair for everyone who would care for competing to be on this ranklist with their Pokémon. [Read more] |
|
Ephenia OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,145 |
Posted: Wed, 29/07/2020 22:34 (4 Years ago) |
|
ribombee please [Read more] |