Forum Thread

According to me, this is bad...
There are some trainers who are just wasting hash tags just for he sake of fun, and stupid hashtags.

I've seen many times ( I m not gonna take their names) in my notifications that some create hashtags to receive something like this message- oh******* plz don't leave, we need you.

What's the matter? There will be many wise trainers who leave without informing,I like those guys.
We should work had to get famous and not by creating stupid hashtags.. Which is the sign of evil!

They are just LEAVING... not DYING.!

I feel that these trainers should be banned, nevermind- leaving and banning is same..
These hash tags waste their time as well as our time.
I'm sure, next time if there's a bye hashtag I'm gonna tell him get the hell outta here,leave!,,,,,,!

---

What exactly are you suggesting? A rule against #leaving-hashtags?

It's not forbidden to post feeds/hashtags just for the purpose of seeking attention. Isn't every feed made for attention? I'd say everyone posts feeds so their friends see it and comment on it. Some of these feeds may be more interesting for you, some may annoy you.
But as long as the hashtag/feed has nothing to do with you, you have no right to complain actually. No one forces you to have such users on your friendlist.

And by the way, users who post #DontLeave{Username} hashtags are not causing the drama - people who rage and complain about it are causing drama, actually ;)

---

Hmm.. Yes admin, I agree with you..but still I have a doubt.-

Hashtags attract us.there are many cool hashtags like interactionlottery.. Very nice... But leaving hashtags... Admin, don't you feel that it is the stupidest way to attract trainers?

Well admin, interacted:/

---

Posting hashtags "for the sake of fun..." aren't ALL of them for fun? Sure, some are used to inform others, but lotteries and raffles are mostly for fun, too. You're basically calling them wasting hashtags, you don't like them, then don't post them. Simple as that.

---

This suggestion has received less than 60% support and was moved to rejected.

Total votes: 23
Support ratio: 30%

---