Forum Thread

So, I noticed that the Pokedex of this site will only keep the dex entry of a certain Pokemon if you still have that Pokemon in your party/PC, if the Pokemon is evolved, the entry will be deleted.
So, how about an option of hiding boxes or Pokemon so mass-clickers won't click our Pokemon and we don't have to buy a lot of everstones? This feature will probably be mostly useful for people who have a huge lot of Pokemon.

What do you think? Yes, or no?

---

I personally wouldn't have this implemented, as this kind of counteracts the need for everstones. This is kind of unnecessary. No support.

---

True, but as I said in the post, this feature will be mostly useful for those with a lot of Pokemon. Even though there are everstones (and everstones are moderately cheap) but if you have a lot of Pokemon the price will keep stacking up.

---

Not really. If you have a lot of Pokémon, then chances are that you have the means to buy the everstones needed for the different stages.
I currently have 900 something everstones, so that I don't have to worry about this, and when those get down to the single digits, which it probably will at some point, I'll just buy more. (I usually buy them when they are at a "discount" where the price is higher than normal, since they stay in stock longer and the price increase is only 5-10 Pd more per stone)

[900 because I still have a few hundred needed for my dex, as well as the two collections I have needing everstones for about half or more per collection.)

The only issue I have with them is that sometimes my Pokémon evolve too quickly. But hiding a box or hiding the pokémon from interactions would have the same problem for me. (It would evolve before I could do anything)

So the only thing I can see about this is it will make everstones worth much less than they currently are worth.

No support.Thats why everstones were made

This has been suggested quite a lot of times previously, but I unfortunately cannot find the thread since the new sub-forums have been implemented. But I remember the suggestions getting quite a lot of "No Supports", and was possibly even rejected.

---

It would would be cool if you had to pay for the time hidden

---

This suggestion has received less than 60% support and was moved to rejected.

Total votes: 16
Support ratio: 12%

---