Forum Search

I'm Feeling Lucky

Searching for: Posts from Saladfish.

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Wed, 18/11/2015 01:35 (9 Years ago)
	Material goods rock my world: Username: KrazyKarp Item(s): Cold Rock Your payment: 50 flying gems, 10 ice gems, and 125k PD? I can add more PD if needed, I wasn't sure how much would be worth it so that amount is kinda random :p Password: Iolaus [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Sun, 08/11/2015 00:34 (9 Years ago)
	I'll take that mega-able Metagross for 380k~ [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Sat, 07/11/2015 14:56 (9 Years ago)
	5 or 6 would be enough for the Mawile. [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Sat, 07/11/2015 02:51 (9 Years ago)
	Oh crap I forgot about those, sorry, ChibiTogepi! I'll take care of that right away! Also found a light rock on a Pinsir, will add that to the main post. [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Sat, 07/11/2015 02:48 (9 Years ago)
	Aaah thank you so much, JustMe! [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Wed, 07/10/2015 00:36 (9 Years ago)
	Soul Eater N.O.T. Without a doubt. Huge disappointment. Wasn't too big of a fan of Blade & Soul and Rail Wars either. Chrno Crusade wasn't too good but the fight scenes were amazing, gotta give it credit for that. [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Fri, 02/10/2015 22:39 (9 Years ago)
	Since all plates have the same rarity, it shouldn't depend on the plate type. :3 [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Sun, 13/09/2015 03:33 (9 Years ago)
	Nothing. Relics have no use but to be sold at the shop, so they're pretty useless in general. [Read more]

Saladfish
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 742

Posted: Mon, 07/09/2015 20:41 (9 Years ago)

I'm with Furret on this. Have self control and just don't post inappropriate content. A lot of users on here don't seem to have the self control to do so which I don't understand to be honest. If you wanna share inappropriate content, there are most likely many sites out there for doing so, but PH isn't one of them. (Using * to block out letters in certain words doesn't change the fact that the word is inappropriate, just to let everyone know)

[Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Mon, 07/09/2015 17:52 (9 Years ago)
	Rejected here, next time use the search feature on the forums to make sure your suggestion hasn't already been created. [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Sun, 06/09/2015 15:37 (9 Years ago)
	I just spun the legend mode, one time with animation enabled and the other time animation disabled, but I didn't have any problem. Have you been able to take any screenshots? [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Tue, 01/09/2015 00:39 (9 Years ago)
	Personally I'd like to see a sweep of all perma-banned users. But I know there was a reason why user accounts can't be deleted, I don't remember why and I can't seem to find the thread. I was thinking maybe just replace the swear words with . Using examples from the list linked in that post: *you, shutteh**up, etc. I also really support that additional suggestion. [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Tue, 01/09/2015 00:01 (9 Years ago)
	Riako has the first Sunny Cherrim. I know this because I have the second Sunny Cherrim, and I was able to track down the first before the 3rd came into existence. [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Sun, 30/08/2015 22:37 (9 Years ago)
	Second suggestion already suggested here. Please use the search feature on the forums before suggesting something to make sure it hasn't already been suggested. [Read more]

Saladfish
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 742

Posted: Wed, 26/08/2015 19:06 (9 Years ago)

I think we all need to think a little before we post. MemeQueen was overreacting before, but now she seems to be providing good points.

Gem scamming is entirely possible and something we must think about. Based off of Aragon's examples in the front post, placing an option for gems there might make it too crowded. It's still a good idea to think about how we can implement gems into this suggestion, though.

[Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Sun, 23/08/2015 03:10 (9 Years ago)
	Can I ask why this would be useful? We have pop-ups just in case we click release on the wrong Pokemon. Other than wanting it to adopt a Pokemon you've accidentally released, this really has no purpose. [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Sat, 22/08/2015 21:35 (9 Years ago)
	Oh hmm... I think I'd go with Suicune and Giratina (Origin). [Read more]

Saladfish OFFLINE Forum Posts: 742	Posted: Tue, 18/08/2015 20:11 (9 Years ago)
	There was trust. You trusted the fact that that was my opinion and that I wasn't purposefully attempting to create a situation that I can use as an example. I didn't think at all that you were picking favorites. I fully realize scammers will always exist. However, in a trading station where all contents of the trade are sent over at the same time, where is there room for scamming? [Read more]

Saladfish
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 742

Posted: Tue, 18/08/2015 19:47 (9 Years ago)

But see, I thought you were picking favorites. It turns out you weren't. The same applies to when people are scammed: a user may seem very trustworthy, but they actually aren't. You trusted what I said, just as anyone could be fooled by words that give off an aura of trust.

See, right there. "I only trade with people I know". Because the rules aren't giving enough security to be able to trade with others.

It can be taken that way. But not everyone thinks that way.

If you don't like this suggestion, then do you have any alternatives other than the TTT that could help with preventing scamming? I'm all game to listen (er, read) to any different ideas people have.

[Read more]

Saladfish
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 742

Posted: Tue, 18/08/2015 19:06 (9 Years ago)

Midnight_Rein, there are multiple issues with your post.

First of all, MemeQueen herself was saying how unclear she found the suggestion. Since she can point out this, why can't Aragon point out that her post wasn't too clear either? Sounds like some favoritism going on, but let's keep personal events out of this.

Secondly: "USER X WAS ROOD TO ME BAN NOW!!!111!!!", "USER X PUBLICLY SHAMED ME !!!111!". All of these could definitely happen. So protecting the mods and Riako from being pummeled by "refund me now!" isn't a valid reason for this rule, since the same type of thing can happen with rule 1.1 and 1.1.1.

How do you find out that a user can't be trusted? Exactly. You can't. You can make a hypothesis, but you won't ever know until the scamming happens. This is why sites have anti-scamming measures and they don't label it as "common sense". It does discourage trading. "Oh, if I'm scammed, I won't get my stuff back. It's probably better not to trade.".

There is also a big problem with the TTT; mods are all human. If everyone used the TTT, mods would be overwhelmed by the sheer number of users. That's why this is such a good suggestion. It puts Pokemon, PD, and nugget trading all in one place. I'm gonna take the examples from my previous post:

QuoteUser A offers a shiny Pidgey for 150k. User B wants to trade. User A sets up the trade, and User B offers. User A accepts the trade, but User B does not send the PD. How is this User A's fault?
Alternativly: User A offers a shiny Pidgey for 150k. User B wants to trade. User A sets up the trade, and User B sends the PD, then offers on the trade. User A cancels the trade and keeps the PD. How is this User B's fault?

But with this suggestion:
User A offers a shiny Pidgey for 150k. User B wants to trade. User A sets up the Pidgey. User B offer 150k on it from the trade station. If User A wanted to cancel the trade to scam, they'd couldn't. This is because the PD is directly being offered and not gifted.

[Read more]

<-- Previous site || Next site -->