Log In
Fighting Weather Castform Don't have an account yet? Register now!
.

Forum Search

I'm Feeling Lucky

Searching for: Posts from Ronin.
Posted: Thu, 06/08/2015 03:02 (9 Years ago)
Quote from TheBluePsyduckHow Much would Van Bagon Be?


QuoteGeneral Pokemon (By Rarities):
Easy - 400 - 1000
Medium - 1000 - 1800
Hard - 2000 - 3000
Rare - 3500 - 5000
Special - 2800 - 3500
Events - 15,000 - 20,000
Unown - 20,000 - 25,000
Starters - 2000 - 3200
[FEMALE] Starters - 3500 - 4000


It is already listed

[Read more]
Posted: Wed, 05/08/2015 21:14 (9 Years ago)
Well If you look at the cost of nuggets in PD and the Price of a Legendary or any Pokemon in PD and just convert that Price and divide it by the worth of each nugget you would get the amount that a Pokemon is worth in Nuggets.

For example if a Pokemon is worth 1,000,000 PD, you divide that by the current price on Nuggets which is 1300 each. 1,000,000/1,300 = Approximately 769~770 Nuggets.

[Read more]
Posted: Fri, 31/07/2015 04:14 (9 Years ago)
Yeah if you look at it nuggets are mostly purchased with real cash. And setting something like being able to exchange your nuggets for cash puts a price on the nuggets and doesn't give the freedom to the player to set the price. Therefore if you put a price of 1,500 pd you would be unable to purchase from other people for PD or get a good deal for them because they could just sell their Nuggets to the system and get that set of PD every time.

So you see it is like supporting not being able to purchase PD from other players because they will no longer have a need to sell them to anyone if they can just get PD for it from the system. Unless you are willing to pay like 2,000PD each Nugget but a player would usually not wait around to try to sell them to another player.

So support on being able to sell your nuggets is just as plausible as asking them to be able to buy PD with cash. Obtaining PD with cash may actually be more plausible than this system being implemented.

[Read more]
Posted: Fri, 31/07/2015 03:47 (9 Years ago)
Well they would be placed around the boxes can't necessarily be placed over writing or links that would disturb the game itself

[Read more]
Posted: Sun, 26/07/2015 19:27 (9 Years ago)
Lii, I have Normal Gems for you!
Username:
Ronin
Amount of Normal Gems: 15
Yes, I have read the rules! "I shall Win the Pink bun bun"

[Read more]
Posted: Sun, 26/07/2015 03:41 (9 Years ago)
Quote from GrandfatherClockHow much would a female Amaura be worth? Or if my Shiny hatches female and I sell it

How about a Shiny Female Amaura?


I would say no different than the previous post. A female Amaura from 15k to 25k. As for the Shiny same as previous all Special Shinies go for 350k to 400k

[Read more]
Posted: Sun, 26/07/2015 03:26 (9 Years ago)
Quote from haileythetyrunthow much would a shiny tyrunt be worth in pd? i've seen some in the auction house go for 400k


Well considering that Tyrunt can be bred normally and the fossils can go for about 10k each as the pokemon itself. I would say just refer to the Shiny Sale prices under Pokemon. As Tyrunt is a Special Rarity I would imagine it would cost 350k to 400k.

Because even though they are gained through a fossil, breeding is possible without the use of a ditto. Players pay for the pokemon not the effort it took for you to breed it.

[Read more]
Posted: Sat, 25/07/2015 23:25 (9 Years ago)
@ItachiKage

I would say since it can't be used to shiny hunt it would be worth the same as it is listed

Unless it is a shiny Ho-oh than I would refer you the Price of a Shiny. Having it so it is your OT doesn't really change the price

[Read more]
Posted: Sat, 25/07/2015 08:45 (9 Years ago)
@MegaSteelix49

Well I can't say that the nature will hold much weight towards its price but I could direct you to the prices of all megas already listed as for Mega Pinsir is listed for 400k to 450k PD

[Read more]
Posted: Fri, 24/07/2015 18:25 (9 Years ago)
I would support it if the pass was something you could only use if you have premium and cost nuggets to purchase and is only valid for one trade

[Read more]
Posted: Fri, 17/07/2015 23:08 (9 Years ago)
Yes more or so.

But I know most of my friends and many people I have added for mutual trading in-case they post something in their feeds, interaction exchanges.

I have the friends who I talk to on a daily basis than there are others who just add each other for the interactions and the connection of trades. Having just 10 of your closes friends won't help you excel in this game we also need random users who can help interact. And along with those random users you can also make new friends. But sometimes those other users don't want to be friends and it helps that there is a method to keep track of it instead of taking up from the time you can spending building up in the game or among other things one must do in a daily basis. That we don't have to spend most of our time going through our list trying to see who hasn't added you.

I understand the suggestion of being friends and who you know but this game is not primarily based on getting to know anyone but interacting. On another note many times you add someone either their not online or don't see that you added them so they need time and you may miss the feed that says that they have added you because you are away or not online. So most times you aren't sure if those individuals added you back.

There have been many occasions where I talk to someone for over a week and they never added me back or in vice versa. So it is a handicap to keep track of your friends and those who want to be friends with you.

[Read more]
Posted: Fri, 17/07/2015 22:41 (9 Years ago)
@Ufimtsev

Even so if you add someone and they add you back but somewhere along the road some people decide to delete their friends and there are many who do than you are left with people that removed you. Going through the list of people that still have you added and the list of people that you have added is quite the homework when you have over hundreds of friends. It becomes quite the chore which shouldn't be necessarily taking up your time when the game is not focused on removing and deleting friends.

So if you have a few friends than this wouldn't be useful to you but it also wouldn't affect you in any way but it would help many of us who do have various friends. You don't have to support it but there is no real reason to be against it.

[Read more]
Posted: Fri, 17/07/2015 20:59 (9 Years ago)
@BlitzTheFox

Again Blitz I direct you to the fact that deleting a bunch of your friends just to pick out a few that don't have you added is unpractical. Cross References names from those who added you to those who haven't you takes a lot of time from your game time and shouldn't be a method of picking out those who haven't added you

[Read more]
Posted: Fri, 17/07/2015 20:41 (9 Years ago)
@ Princess

Both list only show the number of people who have added you and the number of people you have added. so for example I had 252 people added and 223 who added me but no way of knowing who has me added and who doesn't. So I had to delete everyone just to see who has me added. I deleted 252 people to add 223 people who did have me added.

[Read more]
Posted: Fri, 17/07/2015 20:36 (9 Years ago)
Alright there is an issue with individuals adding others but the other party ignoring or never adding them back. So before you know it your friends list gets piled up with individuals that never added you back. So you may get something like 400 friends with 200 who has added you but not knowing which one added you and which ones never did.

So what I suggest is one of two things. Either a system that lets us know who hasn't added us back like a pending friendship so we can cancel the friend request and un-add them.

or

A system in which if someone is requested to be added to your friends they are not added onto your friends until they accept the request in return.

[Read more]
Posted: Wed, 08/07/2015 06:08 (9 Years ago)
Lii, I have Normal Gems for you!
Username:
Ronin
Amount of Normal Gems: 6
Yes, I have read the rules! "I shall win the pink bun bun!"

[Read more]
Posted: Sat, 27/06/2015 11:37 (9 Years ago)
First off having multiple accounts is against the rules therefore we shouldn't be taxed for that and someone that does perform such an action would be easily caught by the staff. As purchases would be made through the same system.

If not removing it completely than lowering the percentage for premiums. Your concerns of multiple accounts is an unreal one when that should be the concern of the Admins and Mods to catch those who have multiple accounts.

The taxes get in the way of players who are trying to make transactions because we lose more than we should. Especially when pokemons are getting higher in cost. The tax does matter especially when you are making multiple purchases and it stacks up in the end. It takes away more than it should and also prevents players from using the full extent of their cash. Meaning if I have 500k exactly and I buying something for 500k the taxes would raise by 25k meaning I would have to raise 25k to cover the cost of the taxes before a transaction can be made.

Your only case that it is to stop people with multiple accounts when there shouldn't be individuals with multiple accounts anyways and those individuals would get their accounts locked when caught.



[Read more]
Posted: Sat, 27/06/2015 05:53 (9 Years ago)
I think the tax that is charged for the transfer of pokedollars should be removed for Premium accounts. If you pay for premium you should be exempted from having to pay the tax.

[Read more]
Posted: Wed, 10/06/2015 16:30 (9 Years ago)
I don't mean just putting it on the about me section, I mean decorating your page with them and putting them where you would like. As Aperture-Blaze suggested that is what I mean

[Read more]
Posted: Sat, 06/06/2015 07:49 (9 Years ago)
I think that it would be more fun to collect Plushies if they had more use than just being collected. For example being able to use it to decorate your Profile with and adding it where you wish.

[Read more]

<-- Previous site || Next site -->