Log In
Rock Weather Castform Don't have an account yet? Register now!
.

Forum Search

I'm Feeling Lucky

Searching for: Posts from Pleiadesu.
Posted: Thu, 14/04/2016 07:41 (8 Years ago)
Well... Support, as long as the "both people are searching at the same time" part is kept. I'd also like to add a bit that would allow random battling only if autolevel is built into it, since the two opponents may not be equally matched. By this I mean a system-imposed autolevel (such as the original level cap, 100.) that cannot be selected by either of the battling users. While an average team level finder would work just as well, users who have higher leveled pokemon would have a harder time finding other users with similarly leveled pokemon.

[Read more]
Posted: Tue, 12/04/2016 13:01 (8 Years ago)
Support, way too overdue. Thank goodness that PH's moderators are actual nice people unlike some other site moderators.

[Read more]
Posted: Tue, 12/04/2016 03:08 (8 Years ago)
Well, no support.
I really don't think it's necessary. Not at all. While I do understand the fact that you have a limited timespan to be on PH, I just don't think it's a good enough reason for a sitewide addition to the Wide Lens that would decrease its scanning time by 90%.

[Read more]
Posted: Tue, 12/04/2016 02:56 (8 Years ago)
The Egg Scanner... As in the one in the lab? No support. I believe that it's already fast enough for both normal and Premium members.
As for the Wide Lens, I like the fact that it takes a long while, since you don't have to check back every 5 seconds to see if the eggs were scanned.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 11:48 (8 Years ago)
In my experience, I'd say 4,000 PD would be enough, which also fits with the Price Check.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 11:04 (8 Years ago)
What kind of new emojis would we actually need? I told you, I already feel ours cover a wide enough spectrum of facial expressions.

Many of us? Even when I scroll through the Notification Wall, I barely see a few emojis, and they're almost always used by a fixed few.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 11:00 (8 Years ago)
So? Do you feel our community actually needs more smilies, or are you just trying to make it copy other sites? I honestly feel the 17 we already have is perfect, because they're not used very frequently, and they also cover a wide variety of facial expressions.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 10:49 (8 Years ago)
I think we all made it clear we know what you mean, Xstar, and provided valid counterpoints.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 10:42 (8 Years ago)
So what exactly are you suggesting? Why exactly would we need more? Do you believe that the 17 we already have aren't enough? How do you think they aren't enough? Explain, please.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 10:24 (8 Years ago)
Video calls? What are you even talking about? Why would we even need such things on this site, when there are already way too many third-party systems you can use if you must talk to someone else with your own voice and face?
Secondly, what do you mean "New and Cool Smilies"? It's not like you can just throw these words at us and expect us to understand what exactly you mean.
Third, I believe cards to be redundant as you can simply send images of said cards through palpad/pm. I mean, you wouldn't want cards you send to someone else being public like plushies.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 09:56 (8 Years ago)
Then could you perhaps send us a screenshot and a detailed explanation of what happened instead of just "oh it got sent somewhere else and i got warned pls fix?"

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 09:53 (8 Years ago)
However, if you did not click User 1's name after you sent it, I cannot believe that it could have ever sent itself to said user.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 09:48 (8 Years ago)
That's not possible. While I can believe you misclicked on another user and the message you were typing carried over, I doubt it would be possible for a message you sent to a user to be resent to a completely different user. While it may seem like such, it is merely a byproduct of lag and is not actually sent to the other user.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 09:45 (8 Years ago)
The fact that you clicked on the second user and the palpad messages carried over is not a bug. Riako has stated he will not "fix" PH because of things that happened because of a mistake on your own part, and not something wrong with the site itself.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 08:31 (8 Years ago)
I don't think you were around for it, Xstarhero, but the feeds with HTML enabled resulted in a daily flood of people trying to be cool with spammy HTML codes.
... So yeah. HTML on PH in any form would be abused over the line.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 07:03 (8 Years ago)
Nope, it's not just a mod only thing.
Seems like it already works for every hashtag.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 06:13 (8 Years ago)
QuoteSo let me explain what happened.
I put a bit of JQuery script on one of my pokemon that forces the page to keep loading, and makes it unreachable.
This is how easily HTML can be used to damage stuff if it's used like this.

While I know how much you guys want to customize stuff, I used a 21-character code to force any browser into an infinite loop and potentially crash it and at the very least prevent viewing of my profile page. This is a much more serious problem than I had estimated it to be.
Not only is this sort of thing possible, the code I used and similar codes can be found on most public forums of coding sites, which means it can be accessed by anyone that uses Google.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 02:25 (8 Years ago)
No support.
While I feel that it's hard to get something from the Treasure Hunt, what purpose would getting you a 100% chance to get Game Chips serve? I mean, that's the same as just lowering the price for the Treasure Hunt in the first place.

[Read more]
Posted: Mon, 11/04/2016 00:32 (8 Years ago)
@Navuso: Mmm. It's just so disappointing when you finally get into an interesting RP, and everyone else starts to post with one-liners with barely any structure.

[Read more]
Posted: Sun, 10/04/2016 14:42 (8 Years ago)
QuoteSo on this whole situation:
I support the removal of coding in nicknames.
There, I've said it. Instead of remaining neutral as I have done so in most cases, I'm directly taking a side. Why? Because for one, it's not actually possible to do a "harmless" modification such as changing your nickname's color in HTML5, as the feature has been removed and you can only do so with CSS. Secondly, the only cases of this happening I have personally seen are cases where they openly disrupt the page, intentionally or unintentionally, and I believe this to be a serious problem.

To add to this feed:
Sure, there are certain HTML codes which can change the color of text, it would in no way fit in the limit of 22 characters if you actually wanted to "spruce up" your pokemon's nickname.

Let's add an example of this.

<h2 style="color:red;">

This simple code would change the color of text (as well as changing its size), but even this is 23 characters long. Consider the fact that this is excluding the name and the ending tag.

[Read more]

<-- Previous site || Next site -->