Log In
Interaction Multiplier IconWater Weather Castform Don't have an account yet? Register now!
.

Forum Thread

Golden Game Chips

Forum-Index → Suggestions → Rejected → Golden Game Chips
~Bailey
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 29

Forum Posts: 225
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 01:14 (10 Years ago)
Well, I have been thinking about this for a LONG while and i thought I would Suggest it! I'm getting a little tired of randomly getting Golden Game Chips. SO i thought 'Well, it would be nice to get a Golden Game Chip when ever i interact/feed a Shiny or Legendary Pokemon!' so to randomly get one instead of my idea it would be a 1/10000 chance of it. so what do ya say? is it a good idea?
Hello Pokeheroes!
Umm... Why are you stalking my Signature?



My precious!

My 3DS Friend Code is...
4339-3899-0322
CarpetMonster
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 34

Forum Posts: 1,147
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 01:18 (10 Years ago)
I do not support. Shinies and Legendaries are owned by a lot of people, and they show up on the click lists quite often. You would get GGC WAY too easily this way. You have a chance of getting GGC when you interact with anything, because the site is encouraging you to interact with everything and NOT just Shinies and Legendaries.
Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 31

Forum Posts: 1,367
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 01:19 (10 Years ago)
I can't support this either for reasons Carpet stated
Navuso
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 69

Forum Posts: 1,828
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 01:21 (10 Years ago)
No support for reasons already stated by Carpet.
JimiiLixx
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 48

Forum Posts: 15
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 02:19 (10 Years ago)
I don't support for the reasons Carpet stated. Also obtaining GGC is already quite easy.
DipperNorth
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 28

Forum Posts: 167
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 02:31 (10 Years ago)
i actually support the subjestion. getting more ggc would actually make me want to interact more. i usually only do the things that showup on the homescreen or for events. i rarely even touch my own pokemon/eggs.




Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 31

Forum Posts: 1,367
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 02:33 (10 Years ago)
You not interacting won't get you ggc. And you already get them from interacting. So you should already want to interact because that's how you get them. So your reasoning I don't understand.
DipperNorth
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 28

Forum Posts: 167
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 02:38 (10 Years ago)
because as i was doing the current event it took me nearly 500 interactions to just get 30 game chips.




Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 31

Forum Posts: 1,367
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 02:41 (10 Years ago)
So you would rather waste time hunting shiny and legendary pokemon to click for ggc as this idea suggest instead of just every pokemon having a chance of giving ggc? That doesn't make sense to me.

And since you just said you hardly click at all, let alone your own pokemon, I don't think you'd be doing that method to get ggc. You'd have a higher chance getting some as the system is now.
DipperNorth
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 28

Forum Posts: 167
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 02:45 (10 Years ago)
yes i would. would rather only have pokemon that i truely want rather than to get legendaries and shinies.




AutumnStar
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 37

Forum Posts: 524
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 03:10 (10 Years ago)
you have every right to work on your dex the way you want it, whether it's to complete it only with pokemon you like, or to literally catch em all - no one is saying you're not allowed to do this or that your method is wrong

as for the idea, no support for the reason carpet stated - the current method encourages equal clicking for all pokemon, and if in the future the build-your-own-clicklist thing is implemented, it will prevent people from making clicklists made solely of legendaries and shinies


This signature is under construction, kiddos!
Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 31

Forum Posts: 1,367
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 03:15 (10 Years ago)
Like Autumn said this isn't to restrict how you fill your dex, this has nothing to do with that. This is about getting ggc from interacting.

And since this site is heavily based on clicking if you start taking away the motivation of clicking (from ggc to PD to leveling up) then it kind of defeats the purpose. Not to sound like a bully or anything, it's just this idea wouldn't help the site or be productive for helpful for people who need pokemon who aren't legendary or shiny clicked.
DipperNorth
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 28

Forum Posts: 167
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 03:18 (10 Years ago)
well im sorry i cant have my own viewpoint!!




Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 31

Forum Posts: 1,367
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 03:20 (10 Years ago)
don't take it as a personal attack. It's a suggestion thread people will disagree or clarify the idea and yes, people will not support something you support. Don't make it about you and us attacking you.

We're all friends here for the most part, and friends can disagree, nothing wrong about that.
DipperNorth
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 28

Forum Posts: 167
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 03:26 (10 Years ago)
you could have ignored me though. you didnt have to talk to me about how stupid you think it is. i put down what i want.




Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 31

Forum Posts: 1,367
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 03:28 (10 Years ago)
Alright, if you feel you have the right to say what you want and no one else dose that's you're thing. But since you aren't discussing the suggestion at hand I suggest that you not rant here. Because you're going off topic now.

Like I said, we're all friends, and we can disagree. But don't let that make you feel attacked.
TheBlueOwl
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 69

Forum Posts: 1,243
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 03:31 (10 Years ago)
Ari, the whole point on having these threads is for people to give their opinion. You gave your opinion, and Queen Pumpkaboo and the others gave theirs. It is not personal, and people aren't trying to be mean or say your idea is stupid, but just like you want the chance to share your opinion, so do the rest of us. :)

As for the suggestion, I don't support either. GGC are supposed to be rare and hard to get, and getting them from every legendary interaction would just make it too easy as there are so many legendaries out there.
DipperNorth
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 28

Forum Posts: 167
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 03:32 (10 Years ago)
you just didnt have to comment back on what i said.and if i ranted on here i would be banned for good. i am doing that to an understanding interweb friend on a different website. im done with this thread. goodbye all.




Diana
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 45

Forum Posts: 1,488
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 04:25 (10 Years ago)
Sorry, but I don't support this either. I feel like it would get people less clicks. GGCs are suppose to be hard to get. They can get you all kind of useful stuff ranging from Vitamins (which could get you a ton of PD from the shop, along with their regular use), Rare Gems, Gold Boxes and even Lake Trio vouchers! Why should Riako make getting these things easier? That would ruin the balance of the game.
~Click?~

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE
Trainerlevel: 31

Forum Posts: 1,367
Posted: Mon, 21/04/2014 04:33 (10 Years ago)
Diana makes a good point about the stuff you could get from the slot itself. I didn't even think of that xD What would happen to the value of the prizes in the slots? The ggc for the spins of the different slots would most likely have to rise up to make up for the common ggc obtained. Which would make things worse as a whole.

Or the odds of getting the prizes would have to lowered since people would spin more since they have ggc.

And our parties would probably be uneven too, my eggs probably wouldn't be clicked as often due to not being legendaries or shinies, and my party when not filled with eggs would just be shinies and legendaries so I know people will click them.

This could affect the whole site in a drastic way if you change the awards you get for clicking and singling out pokemon to give better rewards.