Forum Search

I'm Feeling Lucky

Searching for: Posts from Queen_Pumpkaboo.

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 1,367

Posted: Wed, 10/09/2014 22:22 (9 Years ago)

No support, not only for reasons CatLady said, but also we have the item to evolve it (not sure if you were aware of the Gracidea flower or not. This item evolves Shaymin into Sky Shaymin and when you remove the flower the Sky Shaymin returns to normal.)

So no support as well, as it's already easy enough to have both Shaymins at the same time anyway if you have two of them and one Gracidea flower.

[Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 1,367

Posted: Wed, 10/09/2014 15:58 (9 Years ago)

If you don't want your Pokemon evolving then be sure to give it an Everstone for one. It's why they're there and can prevent any unnecessary evolutions of your Pokemon. If you need an Everstone be sure to check the Emera Mall, there tends to be a lot in stock.

Second of all, I don't think I like the idea of every single time a Pokemon evolves a notification would pop up, be it a Pokemon in my party or box or in auction house or in GTS or whatever. Would you somehow be able to limit the notifications just for your party? And if it's in my party, and I'm looking at it, and see it close to evolve I'd just throw it an Everstone.

[Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 1,367

Posted: Tue, 09/09/2014 23:29 (9 Years ago)

If you implement something that cost money using an item that is in great supply and easy to get, to the point that it has been considered annoying getting them like berries, this suggestion would have to change the entire rate of getting those berries.

They couldn't be as common, meaning less berries found while rumbling (and it has already been said if you don't get berries while rumbling then instead of berries you'd just get nothing instead), less berries to feed to Pokemon, and the berries in the store would cost more since you'd be paying for them to use them in this feature.

And since you're saying this is the same as vitamins, but give lower benefits, wouldn't it make sense just to use the Battle Store and get the stat raising items there instead?

So no support.

[Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Tue, 09/09/2014 23:24 (9 Years ago)
	Hellking I don't think that quote applies to this suggestion. It isn't saying a new way to evolve Pokemon, it is suggesting a way to show if a Pokemon is ready to evolve. That said, I'll support. [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 1,367

Posted: Tue, 09/09/2014 00:50 (9 Years ago)

This seems a bit unnecessary currently since if you want people's opinions on something, we do have polls on our profile. So if you really care how many people like mudkips just make a poll there, and in your fan club say "I have a poll you all can vote on" and get the results there.

It might encourage users just to make threads for the sole purpose of polls, and most polls I see are either jokes, questions about shiny hunts, whether or not the person who made the poll is cute or not, what ships are the best, whether or not the person who made the poll should leave the site or not, etc. Etc. So I'm not sure if people would take a poll seriously on a forum thread by using it with an actual purpose.

I'd say just use the poll on your profile to ask your questions and have people go there to vote.

[Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Tue, 09/09/2014 00:45 (9 Years ago)
	Okay if you take away the legendary Pokemon then I still don't support. This is just royal tunnel, but without questions, and royal tunnel gives you gems and legendaries. As for the other items, you get them from rumbling randomly. This suggestion just mixes the two together. [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Tue, 09/09/2014 00:41 (9 Years ago)
	So it is Royal Tunnel, with guess work instead of questions, to get a legendary Pokemon? It has been said not to suggest ways to get Pokemon, because they will all be implemented in due time. Quote from Riako Please do not suggest ways to get new Pokémon/evolve Pokémon. We're already working on adding all missing Pokémon and all of them will be added sooner or later [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Mon, 08/09/2014 19:35 (9 Years ago)
	Well have you checked the store yet? There are tons of everstones in there right now, as we speak, just so you know. [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Mon, 08/09/2014 19:31 (9 Years ago)
	Riako has already increased the stock of everstones in the store. So, no support since it has already been implemented? xD [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Mon, 08/09/2014 12:14 (9 Years ago)
	No support. This isn't Facebook, really don't need people leaving random likes on my feed for no reason. It doesn't serve a purpose, since my feeds tend to be about trades or sales or things like that I don't need likes. If people "like" your feed, then they can to do the old fashion thing and actually comment on it haha. [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 1,367

Posted: Mon, 08/09/2014 01:43 (9 Years ago)

Just would like to point out if people had the freedom to change their background to anything they see fit, chances are pictures and images of inappropriate nature could and would be used by some users. Thus requiring work to find those people, ban them, and add regulations and restrictions to pages. Also the site would look most likely like a cluttered mess if everyone could see it.

So no support.

[Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Mon, 08/09/2014 00:24 (9 Years ago)
	I know I had opinion on this forever ago, but I agree with Nova. So I'll go as far to say even no support. [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 23:09 (9 Years ago)
	Having an option to delete forums has been suggested before and it has been said message a mod to delete the said forum in question. I would think sending a message would prevent less miss clicks of this delete button or spamming it on other people's forums [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 22:39 (9 Years ago)
	What other purpose would this serve other than user made raffles? [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 22:07 (9 Years ago)
	I'm sorry, I don't understand this suggestion. Please elaborate. [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 1,367

Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 15:33 (9 Years ago)

I consider something like this as a way of skipping other users, basically people who you aren't friends with, and something like skipping other people while clicking was suggested before. So I am asking EPIC to explain how this is different than skipping users you don't want to interact with.

And reasons as to why skipping people would be inefficient can be found here (and I understand this suggestion isn't identical to that one, but I feel like they both have the same principle of "I only want to click certain users/Pokemon") and the reasons there as to why that suggestion wouldn't be helpful I feel can apply to his suggestion. Seems rude to exclude other users just because they aren't on your friend list or because you don't like them.

[Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 1,367

Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 15:05 (9 Years ago)

But isn't the point of the pokedex to fill it yourself? If it already has the Pokemon shown and the number then you defeat the purpose.

It's supposed to be a mystery, even though most of us know already, what Pokemon is next in the pokedex. We are filling it out for Prof. ~~Oak~~ Rowan, so it wouldn't make sense for numbers and Pokemon to already be filled in that we don't have.

If you're really curious as to what is missing, you can goggle the number of the missing Pokemon or google the region's pokedex and see what you're missing. The most common site to look up Pokemon information can be found here at Bulbapedia. An example of a filled Kalos Pokedex for example can be found there. So if you're wondering what you're missing, you can check there for all the regions so far.

So no support.

[Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo OFFLINE Forum Posts: 1,367	Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 14:55 (9 Years ago)
	Accepted Enderknux Enjoy your shiny hunting! [Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 1,367

Posted: Sun, 07/09/2014 14:49 (9 Years ago)

No support.

Why would you limit yourself a clicklist just for people on your friend list? For me I only have 12 people on my friend list, and if their parties all have 6 Pokemon, then that's 72 clicks. And then I'm done.

Why limit it? Everyone benefits from the clicklist, from having eggs hatched, to getting on the index page, to leveling up Pokemon, etc. This clicklist doesn't make sense to me because it sounds like you're limiting yourself in terms of clicking. You might as well mass click others or use the online clicklist or just return the clicks given to you or do it randomly. Your friends aren't only relying on you to click their eggs for example, they're most likely using the clicklists already in place to get those interactions, or making feeds for click exchanges. And if people don't want their Pokemon clicked it is usually for evolution reasons, which is why people give their Pokemon everstones to prevent that, so that shouldn't be an issue of people not wanting their Pokemon clicked.

This clicklist doesn't to me add any benefits that the other clicklists don't. So I don't support.

[Read more]

Queen_Pumpkaboo
OFFLINE

Forum Posts: 1,367

Posted: Sat, 06/09/2014 21:39 (9 Years ago)

So these would be random Pokemon, not owned by anyone, that you can randomly get?

I never played this Showdown game so maybe I'm missing the point, but I personally don't see the appeal of basically gambling every battle.

Picking the difficulty, however, I could see aiding in more control over more consistent and less uneven battles.

Still, this seems quite complicated, and a bit much for an adoptables site. Granted we have the battling system we still don't even have the option to battle people randomly, we still can't battle on Rumble Missions, let alone have a system for putting in Pokemon and having them randomly assigned to other users to battle with and organize into difficulty options.

So for now I still don't support since this whole idea seems a bit much and overly complicated for a Pokemon adoptables site. Maybe when the battle system is fleshed out more, with moves and abilities and more items coming into play and being able to battle random people instead of challenging other users then something like this might happen but for right now I don't see this happening with the lack of battling complexity we have currently.

[Read more]

<-- Previous site || Next site -->